HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sanford, J. O. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sanford, J. O. Agricola Articles by Sanford, J. O.

Straw and Tillage Management Practices in Soybean-Wheat Double-Cropping¹

Managing straw residue in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.J double-cropping systems can be a problem, and many management systems are currently being used. Type of tillage used is, to some extent, determined by the straw management practice. In this study, five tillage-straw management practices were studied on Brooksville silty clay (fine, montmorillonitic, thermic Aquic Chromudert) for 4 years. Only 3 years' data are reported, however, since all treatments failed 1 year because of extreme drought. Objectives were to determine effects of tillage-straw management practices on (a) stand establishment, growth and yield of double-cropped soybeans, (b) surface soil organic matter content, and to (c) compare costs and net returns of the wheat-soybean systems and the monoculture soybeans.

In 1 of 3 years when rain did not soon follow planting, preparing the soil by disking, whether the straw was burned or not, resulted in reduced germination and growth. During 1 year, germination was adversely affected when the straw was shredded and left on the soil surface. Yields were highest and most consistent when soybeans were no-till seeded into the burned stubble, but these yields did not differ from systems where straw was burned followed by conventional tillage or where straw was shredded followed by no-till planting. The average soybean yield was 29% less for the best double-crop practice than for monoculture soybeans (1,370 kg/ha vs. 1,927 kg/ha). Wheat yields averaged 3,384 kg/ha and were not affected by the tillage-straw management practices. Excluding a year in which all double-crop systems failed, all double-crop systems except where the wheat straw was incorporated in land preparation gave greater economic returns than monocrop soybeans. The double-crop system in which straw was burned followed by no-till seeding and cultivation, gave the greatest average net return.

Key Words: No-till • Straw burning • Soybean growth • Soybean emergence • Organic matter • Triticum aestivum L. • Glycine max (L.) Merr

² Research agronomist, USDA, ARS, Mississippi State, MS 39762

Received for publication July 10, 1981.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. R. Brye, D. E. Longer, and E. E. Gbur Impact of Tillage and Residue Burning on Carbon Dioxide Flux in a Wheat-Soybean Production System Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 23, 2006; 70(4): 1145 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Wesley, L. A. Smith, and S. R. Spurlock Residual Effects of Fall Deep Tillage on Soybean Yields and Net Returns on Tunica Clay Soil Agron. J., September 1, 2000; 92(5): 941 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text]