Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1982
Published in Agron J 74:637-639 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bar-Yosef, B.
Right arrow Articles by Sagiv, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bar-Yosef, B.
Right arrow Articles by Sagiv, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bar-Yosef, B.
Right arrow Articles by Sagiv, B.

Response of Tomatoes to N and Water Applied Via a Trickle Irrigation System. II. Water1

B. Bar-Yosef and B. Sagiv2

The objective of the study was to relate tomato fruit yield and N uptake to water application rates via a trickle irrigation system at given N rates and to total water potential in the soil root volume. This information is needed to improve tomato cropping management under point source irrigation. The experiments were conducted on sandy soils at three different locations in Israel and included combinations of several daily N and water application rates, and two irrigation intervals. Fruit yield responded linearity to increasing total irrigation rates (Qw) up to 80% of the accumulated evaporation from a U.S. Class A pan (Ep), the slope of the response line being 15 metric tons/ha for each 10% change in Qw/Ep. The optimum average N concentration in the irrigation solution was determined to be 130 ppm N, below which yields and growth were inhibited and above which the soil water potential {Psi} decreased, thus increasing the dry matter content of the fruit. A decrease in {Psi} from –50 to –150 centibars appreciably decreased fresh fruit yield; a further decrease in {Psi} caused a slower decrease in fresh fruit yield.

Key Words: Fertigation • N-uptake • Soil water potential • Yield


1 Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, P.O.B. 6, Bet Dagan, Israel. No. 285-E, 1980 series.

2 Soil scientist and agronomist, Div. of Soil Chemistry & Plant Nutrition, ARO, Bet Dagan, Israel.

Received for publication January 5, 1981.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
T. L. Thompson, T. A. Doerge, and R. E. Godin
Subsurface Drip Irrigation and Fertigation of Broccoli: II. Agronomic, Economic, and Environmental Outcomes
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 178 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
T. L. Thompson, T. A. Doerge, and R. E. Godin
Subsurface Drip Irrigation and Fertigation of Broccoli: I. Yield, Quality, and Nitrogen Uptake
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 186 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy.