Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1982
Published in Agron J 74:546-550 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mason, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mason, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, D. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mason, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, D. A.

Standard, Cold, and Tetrazolium Germination Tests as Estimators of Field Emergence of Mechanically Damaged Soybean Seed1

S. C. Mason, J. J. Vorst, B. J. Hankins and D. A. Holt2

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] germination is routinely estimated from laboratory germination test results. However, differences in seed quality have caused variable germination performance both in the laboratory and in the field. The objective of this research was to determine ability of standard, tetrazolium, and cold germination tests to estimate average field emergence of mechanically damaged soybean seed. Damaged seeds were subjected to standard, tetrazolium, and cold germination tests and were planted in the field to determine field emergence and seed yield. Germination test accuracy was measured by analyzing the difference between field emergence and the germination test results.

Increasing levels of mechanical damage significantly decreased percent laboratory germination in both years and generally decreased percent field emergence. The tetrazolium test indicated a significantly higher percent laboratory germination than did standard germination and cold tests, and the standard germination test resulted in significantly higher percent laboratory germination than did the cold test. The tetrazolium test was not sensitive in detecting recently induced mechanical damage, and the cold test showed more variability in percent laboratory germination.

In 1975 the standard germination and cold test accurately estimated average field emergence within ± 8 and ± 12%. The tetrazolium test over-estimated average field emergence from 0 to 20%. In 1976 the standard germination test estimated average field emergence within ± 12%, the tetrazolium test generally over-estimated average field emergence from 0 to 18%, and the cold test under-estimated average field emergence by 5 to 41%.

Key Words: Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Seeding rate • Seed yield


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn., W. Lafayette, IN 47907, Journal No. 8393. Financial support was provided by the Indiana Crop Improvement Association.

2 Instructor, associate professor of agronomy, Purdue Univ., extension agronomist, Univ. of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR 72203 (formerly assistant professor of Agronomy, Purdue Univ.) and professor of agronomy, Purdue Univ.

Received for publication January 26, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy.