Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1982
Published in Agron J 74:518-521 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berkat, O.
Right arrow Articles by Briske, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Berkat, O.
Right arrow Articles by Briske, D. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Berkat, O.
Right arrow Articles by Briske, D. D.

Water Potential Evaluation of Three Germination Substrates Utilizing Polyethylene Glycol 20,0001

Omar Berkat and D. D. Briske2

Numerous problems exist in controlling substrate water potentials for germination investigations. Therefore, an evaluation of three germination substrates was conducted at four water potentials maintained by various concentrations of polyethylene glycol 20,000 (PEG). The substrates were: 1) PEG saturated paper (paper), 2) paper on PEG saturated vermiculite (vermiculite), and 3) paper on foam floating on PEG solution (foam). A water vapor seal was placed on half of the trays prior to placement in a controlled environment. Germination substrate water potentials were measured with a thermocouple psychrometer every 2 days for a 2-week period. Germination substrate water potentials never fully equilibrated with the solution water potentials. Germination substrate water potential in the nonvapor sealed trays decreased 0.8 MPa within a 2-day period while vapor sealed trays showed no appreciable decrease. At the end of the 12-day period substrate water potentials had decreased 0.15 and 1.85 MPa for the vapor sealed and nonsealed trays, respectively. When both vapor-sealed and non-vapor sealed trays were considered, vermiculite and foam substrates exhibited a significantly higher water potential than paper. When only the vapor-sealed trays were considered, the influence of type of germination substrate was reduced, although vermiculite exhibited a higher water potential than the foam. The foam substrate was considered most desirable because of ease of preparation and tendency to avoid accumulation of free-standing solution.

Key Words: Vapor sealed trays • Paper substrate • Vermiculite substrate • Foam substrate


1 Contribution of the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Technical Paper No. 16924.

2 Graduate research assistant and assistant professor, Range Science Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843.

Received for publication June 8, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy.