Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1982
Published in Agron J 74:88-91 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ware, G. O.
Right arrow Articles by Moon, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ware, G. O.
Right arrow Articles by Moon, L. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ware, G. O.
Right arrow Articles by Moon, L. C.

The Mitscherlich Plant Growth Model for Determining Critical Nutrient Deficiency Levels1

G. O. Ware, K. Ohki and L. C. Moon2

The success of a plant tissue analysis program depends on the calibration relating growth and nutrient concentration in specified plant tissues for each essential element. The minimal nutrient concentrations in tissues associated with maximum growth have been determined from calibration curves that were drawn free-hand to best fit the respective X and Y values in graphical plotting. Statistical models to establish critical deficiency levels related to 90% maximum growth are desirable to reduce the arbitrariness of the graphical procedure.

A modified Mitscherlich response equation was used to quantify critical deficiency levels by characterizing plant growth as a function of tissue nutrient concentration. The model presented is y = ß(1 — {gamma}e-ax) where y is the plant yield at tissue concentration x, and {alpha}, ß, and {gamma} are parameters to be estimated. Critical deficiency levels determined from the Mitscherlich model were significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the previously reported nutrient values of the same studies utilizing the graphical procedure.

Key Words: Statististical model • Plant tissue analysis • Deficiency level


1 Contribution from the Univ. of Georgia Agric. Exp. Stns., Athens, GA 30602, and the Georgia Station, Experiment, GA 30212.

2 Station statistician, Agric. Exp. Stns., Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, professor and systems specialist, Dep. of Agronomy and Agric. Economics, Experiment, GA 30212, respectively.

Received for publication October 9, 1980.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
South Asia Economic JournalHome page
A. S. Sethi
Some Methodological Aspects of Rates of Growth Computations: Limitations and Alternatives
South Asia Economic Journal, June 1, 2008; 9(1): 195 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. T. Edwards and L. C. Purcell
Soybean Yield and Biomass Responses to Increasing Plant Population Among Diverse Maturity Groups: I. Agronomic Characteristics
Crop Sci., August 1, 2005; 45(5): 1770 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. H. Alsaeedi and A. M. Elprince
Critical Phosphorus Levels for Salicornia Growth
Agron. J., March 1, 2000; 92(2): 336 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy.