Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1982
Published in Agron J 74:119-121 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Roath, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Roath, W. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Roath, W. W.

Compensatory Response of Sunflower to Stand Reduction Applied at Different Plant Growth Stages1

J. F. Miller and W. W. Roath2

Differential plant populations occurring among plots in yield trials can be critical in evaluating potential worth of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids or breeding lines. The objective of this study was to determine degree of loss in seed yield when stand is reduced at various growth stages of plant development and to identify the nature of plant compensation for stand loss in sunflower.

No significant reductions in seed yield occurred when plant populations were reduced 25% from the check (50,000 plants/ha) at the 4, 8, and 16-leaf growth stages. Compensation was due to significant increases in head diameter. Stand loss of 25% at later growth stages resulted in significant yield loss. Compensation occurred in seed weight as well as head diameter when stands were reduced 50% at early growth stages. Seed yields were reduced 18 to 23%.

Sunflower plants were able to significantly compensate even when 75% stand reduction was applied at bud and flowering stages, with seed weight accounting for most recovery in yield. A 38 to 42% and 56 to 58% loss occurred when stands were reduced 75% at the 4 to 16-leaf and bud to flowering growth stages, respectively. Oil percentages of seeds from plants grown in plots with high stand reductions were reduced 6% and height was decreased 25 cm. Significant negative correlations were noted between oil percentage and height with yield, head diameter, and seed weight at the lowest plant population. Plant population would be critical to control in studies investigating inheritance of plant height or oil percentage of sunflower.

Key Words: Helianthus annuus L. • Seed yield • Sunflower breeding • Plant population • Stand reduction


1 Joint contribution from USD A, ARS, and the North Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn., Fargo, ND 58105. Research conducted in part under a grant from the Crop Insurance Research Bureau, Inc., and the National Crop Insurance Association. Contribution No. 1134.

2 Research geneticists, USDA, ARS, Dep. of Agronomy, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105.

Received for publication January 16, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy.