Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1981
Published in Agron J 73:941-944 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jones, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jones, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, J. E.

Comparative DRIS and Crop Log Diagnosis of Sugarcane Tissue Analyses1

C. A. Jones and J. E. Bowen2

The Crop Log system of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) tissue analysis is a critical concentration approach which is widely used for the diagnosis of nutrient deficiencies and imbalances in the Hawaii sugar industry. Recent studies conducted elsewhere suggest that the Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS), which utilizes ratios of tissue nutrient concentrations rather than the concentrations themselves, consistently gives a lower percentage of incorrect diagnoses of nutrient deficiencies and imbalances than critical concentration approaches. In these studies, it is often unclear whether the higher accuracy of the DRIS approach was due to inherent advantages of the DRIS approach or to local calibration of the system. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the conventional Crop Log approach, a locally calibrated Crop Log approach, and DRIS. In an analysis of 28 past fertilizer experiments on the island of Hawaii the locally calibrated Crop Log and DRIS approaches gave 3 and 5% fewer incorrect diagnoses, respectively, than the conventional Crop Log approach. The results suggest that the DRIS approach can provide slightly more accurate diagnoses of nutrient deficiencies than the conventional Crop Log approach.

Key Words: Crop-log • Diagnosis-andrecommendation-integrated-system, • Nutrient-analysis • Saccharum spp.


1 Contribution of the Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association Exp. Stn. P. O. Box 1057, Aiea, HI 96701 and Dep. of Botany, Univ. of Hawaii, Hilo, HI 96720, as Journal Series No. 2592 of the Hawaii Agric. Exp. Stn.

2 Formerly associate agronomist Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, now plant physiologist, USDA, SEA-AR,; P.O. Box 748, Temple, TX 76501; and professor, Beaumont Agric. Res. Center, Univ. of Hawaii, 461 West Lanikaula St., Hilo, HI 96720.

Received for publication November 28, 1980.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Agronomy.