Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1981
Published in Agron J 73:737-743 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hart, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by McMurtrey, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hart, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by McMurtrey, J. E., III
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hart, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by McMurtrey, J. E.

Forage Yield and Quality of Quaker Comfrey, Alfalfa, and Orchardgrass1

R. H. Hart, A. J. Thompson, III, J. H. Elgin, Jr. and J. E. McMurtrey, III2

Quaker comfrey (Symphytum x uplandicum Nym.) has been promoted for years as a high-yielding proteinrich forage crop. Although considerable research has been done in other countries, almost none has been reported from the United States. Therefore, we established field trials on a Codorus silt loam (Fluvaquentic Dystrochrept) at Beltsville, Maryland and on an Archerson sandy clay loam (Aridic Argiustoll) at Cheyenne, Wyoming. At Beltsvill, three cultivars of comfrey under two cutting schedules were compared to orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) at three N rates, and to three cultivars of alfalfa ( Medicago saliva L.) alone and in mixture with orchardgrass. At Cheyenne, two cultivars of comfrey at three N rates were compared with alfalfa. Forage dry matter yield was determined at both locations; protein concentration and in vitro dry matter digestibility were determined at Beltsville, and vitamin B12 concentration was determined at Cheyenne. Comfrey yields at both locations were about half those of alfalfa or orchardgrass at the same N rate. Closer spacing of comfrey probably would have increased yield. Protein concentration of comfrey was less than that of alfalfa or orchardgrass except at very high N rates. In vitro dry matter digestibilities of comfrey, alfalfa, and orchardgrass were 37, 62, and 61%, respectively. Contrary to some reports, comfrey forage did not contain detectable amounts of vitamin B12. Moisture content of fresh comfrey averaged 85% and was consistently higher than that of alfalfa or orchardgrass. In view of its low yield and digestibility in these tests, high cost of establishment and weed control, and low palatability to some animal species, Quaker comfrey is not recommended as a forage crop.

Key Words: Symphytum spp. • Crude protein • In vitro digestibility • Vitamin B12 • Review


1 Contribution from High Plains Grasslands Res. Stn., USDA, SEA-AR, Cheyenne, Wyoming and Field Crops Lab. and Light and Plant Growth Lab., USDA, SEA-AR, Beltsville, Maryland.

2 Research agronomist, USDA, SEA-AR-HPGRS, 8408 Hildreth Road, Cheyenne, WY 82001; agricultural research technician, USDA, SEA-AR, L&PGL, Beltsville, MD 20705; and research agronomists, USDA, SEA-AR, FCL, Beltsville, MD 20705, respectively.

Received for publication September 29, 1980.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Agronomy.