Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1981
Published in Agron J 73:639-643 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mtui, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wassom, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mtui, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wassom, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mtui, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wassom, C.

Canopy Temperatures, Water Use, and Water Use Efficiency of Corn Genotypes1

T. A. Mtui, E. T. Kanemasu and C. Wassom2

It is desirable to describe and characterize physiological properties of corn (Zea mays L.) genotypes that will permit a basis for selecting genotypes. The objective of this field study was to compare two hybrids (Mo17 x B73, A619 x A632) and their respective inbred parents under irrigated and nonirrigated conditions. Measurements of canopy temperature, stomatal diffusive resistance, xylem water potential, leaf area index, ear dry weight, and grain yield were determined. Water use was determined from neutron moderation measurements of the soil-water profile. The soil was a fine silty, mixed mesic, Pachic Haplustoll that holds approximately 250 mm of plant available water.

Hybrids had higher grain yield, water use, and water use efficiency than the inbred parents under both irrigated and nonirrigated conditions. Estimates of water use by both hybrids and inbreds were greater for irrigated than for nonirrigated treatments. Early ear dry weight appeared to be an indicator of final ear weight, and in this particular study, was an indicator of final grain weight. Canopy temperatures were cooler for hybrids than for the inbreds which is consistent with greater water use by the hybrids. Stomatal resistance and xylem water potential were not significantly different among genotypes.

Key Words: Stomatal diffusive resistance • Xylem water potential • Ear dry weight


1 Contribution No. 80-374J, Dep. of Agronomy. Evapotrans. Lab., Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506.

2 Graduate research assistant, Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506 and research microclimatologist, Research geneticist, Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506.

Received for publication June 13, 1980.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. Balota, W. A. Payne, S. R. Evett, and M. D. Lazar
Canopy Temperature Depression Sampling to Assess Grain Yield and Genotypic Differentiation in Winter Wheat
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1518 - 1529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Agronomy.