Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1981
Published in Agron J 73:605-610 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fales, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wakefield, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fales, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wakefield, R. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fales, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wakefield, R. C.

Effects to Turfgrass on the Establishment of Woody Plants1

S. L. Fales and R. C. Wakefield2

Suppression of woody plants by grasses has been widely reported; but few studies have investigated the factors responsible for the reduced growth and poor appearance often shown by ornamental trees and shrubs planted in association with turfgrass. This research was undertaken to determine the major factors responsible for this phenomenon.

A field study, conducted over two growing seasons, evaluated the growth of flowering dogwood ( Cornus florida L.) and forsythia (Forsythia intermedia Spaeth.) planted in established sod (Enfield silt loam soil, Typic Dystrochrept). Treatments included different sized areas of turf-free space (0.3m2, 0.7m2, and 23.7m2), surface and subsurface placement of fertilizer and irrigation, and two mowing heights (10 cm and 4 an). Turfgrass significantly reduced the growth of both woody species. Although supplementary fertilizer, applied as a topdressing, failed to benefit the ornamentals, subsurface treatments resulted in considerable increases in growth. Competition for moisture did not appear to be responsible for the observed differences in growth, since maintaining a high level of soil moisture failed to overcome the inhibitory effects of the turfgrass. Competition for N, however, was indicated by results of leaf tissue analysis.

A bioassay experiment tested the hypothesis that the competitive nature of turfgrasses involves an allelopathic mechanism. Aqueous leachates of the roots of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), red fescue (Festuca rubra L.), and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensi L.) were applied to rooted cuttings of forsythia. Top growth of the forsythia was inhibited by leachates from all three turfgrass species. Root growth was suppressed by ryegrass and red fescue leachates.

Results of these experiments indicate that the suppression of woody plants by turfgrasses may involve chemical inhibition as well as direct competition for available N.

Key Words: Allelopathy • Competition • Nitrogen • Irrigation • Phosphorus • Potassium • Ornamental plants


1 Contribution No. 1703, Agric. Exp. Stn., Kingston, RI 02881. From a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a M.S. degree at the Univ. of Rhode Island.

2 Research associate and professor, respectively, Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Univ. of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island.

Received for publication March 13, 1980.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. Busey
Cultural Management of Weeds in Turfgrass: A Review
Crop Sci., November 1, 2003; 43(6): 1899 - 1911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Agronomy.