Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1981
Published in Agron J 73:476-481 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wanjura, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Newton, O. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wanjura, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Newton, O. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wanjura, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Newton, O. H.

Predicting Cotton Crop Boll Development1

D. F. Wanjura and O. H. Newton2

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) lint development on the Texas High Plains frequently spans periods of low temperature that reduce yield and quality. We conducted a study in 1977 to 1979 at Lubbock, Texas, to develop a procedure for estimating the level of crop lint maturity at any time after boll setting begins.

The procedure includes a model that uses the initiation date for each 1/10 increment of the total crop of bolls and average daily air temperatures. Data generated by the estimating procedure were compared with data on observed crop lint development in the cultivars ‘Paymaster 303’, ‘Paymaster 909’, and ‘Acala 3080’. The observed data were obtained by tagging all blooms initiated by plants in two 3-tn row lengths of each cultivar and measuring boll periods of the permanent bolls.

The procedure produced accurate timely estimates for crop lint development and boll opening rate for all cultivars in 1977 and 1978. Observed boll periods in all cultivars were 15% shorter than estimates for the entire crop of bolls in 1979. A likely explanation for the shortened boll periods was that 1979 plants required 2 weeks longer to reach first bloom than 1977 and 1978 plants and were physiologically older. Other researchers have also reported reduced boll periods in "old" cotton plants.

Key Words: Boll period • Simulation • Boll setting pattern • Temperature • Lint development • Physiological age • Gossypium hirsutum L.


1 Cooperative investigations of the Southern Plains Cotton Res. Lab., USDA, SEA-AR and the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn.

2 gricultural engineer, USDA, SEA-AR, Southern Plains Cotton Research Laboratory; and agricultural meteorologist, National Weather Service (retired). Route 3, Lubbock, TX 79401.

Received for publication April 21, 1980.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Agronomy.