Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1978
Published in Agron J 70:9-14 (1978)
© 1978 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reid, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kocher, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reid, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kocher, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Reid, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kocher, R. E.

Mineral Utilization by Lambs and Guinea Pigs Fed Mg-Fertilized Grass and Legume Hays1

R. L. Reid, G. A. Jung, I. J. Roemig and R. E. Kocher2

Hypomagnesemic tetany, in both spring and winter forms, is a serious metabolic problem in beef cow herds in the northeast U. S. Control of the syndrome may be achieved by Mg supplementation of the diet, by selecting or breeding plants with the ability to accumulate Mg, or by increasing the concentration of Mg in forages by Mg fertilization or foliar application. The present study was designed to determine whether fertilization of forages with a moderate level of an available Mg fertilizer would effectively increase the concentration of Mg in the forage and improve the Mg status of ruminant animals. A number of grasses and legumes were grown in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, fertilized with kieserite (MgSO4·H2O) at the rate of 112 kg Mg/ha, and harvested as hays in 1973 and 1974. Magnesium concentration in the forages was determined by chemical analysis, and utilization of minerals evaluated with growing wether lambs in balance trials. The use of the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) as an assay animal for mineral studies with ruminant species was examined in a limited number of trials. Magnesium fertilization increased the concentration of Mg in hays, from a mean value of 0.17 to 0.20% for all forages studied. Fertilization had no significant effect on dry matter digestibility (DMD) of the hays by lambs, and had a variable effect on apparent absorption of Mg. Apparent absorption of Mg was increased significantly, from 24.4 to 29.5%, by fertilization of the grass hays, with no effect (31.8 vs. 31.9% for non-fertilized and fertilized treatments) in the legume hays. Apparent absorption of Mg, Ca, and P was higher in legumes than in grasses, but there were no differences in absorption of K and S due either to type of hay or to fertilization. Magnesium fertilization resulted in a highly significant increase in Mg retention by lambs, 0.17 vs. 0.28 g/day for non-fertilized compared to fertilized treatments, for all forages. Retention of Mg, Ca, and P was markedly higher from the legume than from the grass hays. Fertilization had no effect on retention of Ca or P. Fertilization resulted in the most marked improvements in Mg retention from orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) when harvested (1974) at a vegetative stage in West Virginia and Pennsylvania. DMD values of forages were lower, and apparent absorption and retention of Mg much higher, in the guinea pig than in the lamb in comparative trials. Substantial species differences in the degree and nature of Mg utilization of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) hays fertilized with different levels of MgSO4 suggest that the guinea pig would not be a suitable essay animal for mineral availability studies with the ruminant.

Key Words: Forage quality • Balance trials • Grass-legume composition • Grass tetany • Mineral availability


1 Published with the approval of the Director of the West Virginia Agric. Exp. Stn. as Scientific Paper No. 1471. This study is part of a co-operative project between the U. S. Regional Pasture Research Laboratory, ARS, University Park, Pa., and the West Virginia Agric. Exp. Stn., Morgantown, W. Va.

2 Professor of animal science, West Virginia Univ.; agronomist, U.S. Regional Pasture Research Laboratory, University Park, Pa.; research assistant, Division of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, West Virginia Univ.; research technician, U.S. Regional Pasture Research Laboratory, University Park, Pa.

Received for publication February 25, 1977.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Agronomy.