Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1978
Published in Agron J 70:113-118 (1978)
© 1978 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leamer, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wiegand, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leamer, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wiegand, C. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Leamer, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wiegand, C. L.

Seasonal Changes in Reflectance of Two Wheat Cultivars1

R. W. Leamer, J. R. Noriega and C. L. Wiegand2

Accurate crop identification from remote sensing signals is dependent on a knowledge of differences in characteristics of reflectance from various crop canopies. The objective of the present work was to follow changes in the reflectance of two dissimilar wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.)] cultivars through a growing season to determine which reflectance characteristics were suitable for use in the analysis and interpretation of spectral reflectance curves. Reflectance over the wavelength interval of 0.45 to 2.50 µm was measured with a ground-based spectroradiometer on nine cloud-free days between planting and maturity of wheat planted on Hidalgo sandy clay loam (Typic Calculstols) soil. Seeding rate affected the rate of ground cover, but not the spectral reflectance of either a winter or a spring wheat once about 25% of the area was covered by vegetation. All reflectance curves had the characteristic shape for vegetated surfaces by 4 weeks after emergence. The proportion of the ground covered by plants was more important than development stages of the plants in determining spectral responses, except at the end of the season when the plants senesced and lost pigmentation. Through the season soil was much less reflective than green vegetation at 0.75, 0.90, and 1.10 µm and much more reflective at 1.65 and 2.20 µm, making these wavelengths valuable for distinguishing vegetation from soil background and for assessing vegetation cover or density.

Key Words: Remote sensingTriticum aestivum • Vegetative growth stages • Spectroradiometer • Spectra


1 Soil and Water Conservation Research, Southern Region, ARS-USDA, Weslaco, TX 78596. This study was supported in part by NASA Contract No. S-53876-AG.

2 Soil scientist, physical science technician, and soil scientist, respectively, USDA, Weslaco, Tex.

Received for publication April 8, 1977.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
Shaharuddin Bin Ahmad and J.G. Lockwood
Albedo
Progress in Physical Geography, December 1, 1979; 3(4): 510 - 543.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Agronomy.