Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1978
Published in Agron J 70:109-113 (1978)
© 1978 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dotzenko, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dotzenko, A. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dotzenko, A. D.

Yield and Quality of Cicer Milkvetch Forage as Influenced by Cutting Frequency1

C. E. Townsend, D. K. Christensen and A. D. Dotzenko2

Cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) is a potentially valuable forage crop for irrigated pastures, but little information is available concerning the effects of management practices on forage production. Therefore, the objective of this field study was to evaluate the effect of six harvest treatments on yield, forage quality, weed invasion, and persistence of stand. The study was conducted under irrigation on a Nunn clay loam soil (aridic Argiustoll). The treatments consisted of clipping the forage two, three, four, five, six, and seven times annually for 3 years to a height of 7.5 cm. Forage yields and weed counts were taken for 3 years, and seven quality factors and four mineral elements were evaluated for 2 years. Total nonstructural carbohydrates in the rhizomes were measured at the end of the 3rd harvest year. There were significant differences in yield among harvest treatments in 2 of 3 years and for the 3-year average. In general, the two- and three-cut treatments were the most productive with 3-year average yields of 10.5 and 10.7 metric tons/ha, respectively. Considerably more weeds were present in the five-, six-, and seven-cut treatments than in the two-, three-, and four-cut treatments. Annual weeds were most prevalent during the first 2 years, but by the 3rd year dandeloins (Taraxacum spp.) were the most common. Although there were significant differences among treatments for total nonstructural carbohydrates in the rhizomes, the differences were not associated with persistence because persistence of stands was excellent for all treatments. In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and all chemical constituents evaluated, with the exception of magnesium and potassium, differed significantly among treatments each year. In general, cell wall constituents (CWC) and cellulose decreased with an increase in the frequency of cutting. Protein, IVDMD, and phosphorus increased as the number of cuttings increased. Lignin, hemicellulose, silica, calcium, magnesium, and potassium varied among cutting treatments. The quality of cicer milkvetch forage was high for all cutting treatments. Based on yield, quality, and stand persistence cicer milkvetch has the attributes of a desirable forage species.

Key Words: Astragalus cicer L. • Weed population • Stand persistance


1 Contribution of the ARS, USDA, in cooperation with the Colorado State Univ. Exp. Stn., Scientific Series No. 2216.

2 Research Geneticist, ARS, USDA, Crops Research Laboratory, former graduate student, and professor of agronomy, Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, CO 80523.

Received for publication March 19, 1977.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Agronomy.