Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1977
Published in Agron J 69:917-923 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanderlip, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Arkin, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vanderlip, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Arkin, G. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vanderlip, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Arkin, G. F.

Simulating Accumulation and Distribution of Dry Matter in Grain Sorghum1

R. L. Vanderlip and G. F. Arkin2

Plant growth simulation models bring together what is known about various aspects of plant growth and dry matter accumulation. They are valuable in simulating the effects of management, environmental, or genetic factors on plant growth and in determining what areas of knowledge about plant growth are most lacking. However, most growth models deal only with total dry matter production. Reported here are submodels for calculating stage of development and partitioning dry matter production into plant parts based on these stages of development for grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.).

Testing of the submodels using 25 data sets (from six locations in the sorghum growing area of the United States) including a number of hybrids, several years, and both irrigated and dryland production showed that the submodels provided unbiased estimates of: date of growing point differentiation; date of half-bloom; physiological maturity; grain yield; and harvest index. Precision of modeling stages of development was acceptable for most uses (S.E. of 4.1 to 5.0 days). Standard errors for grain yield and harvest index were 18.4 g/plant (C.V. = 29.0%) and 0.06 (C.V. = 13.2%), respect ively.

Key Words: Modeling • Partitioning • Morphology • Stages of Development • Grain yield


1 Contribution from Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Tex., in cooperation with the ARS, USDA, Temple, Tex. and Contribution No. 1534, Agronomy Dep., Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Manhattan, KS 66506.

2 Research agronomist (on leave from Agronomy Dep., Kansas State Univ.), and assistant professor. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Temple, TX 76501.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. J. Gerik, W. D. Rosenthal, R. L. Vanderlip, and L. J. Wade
Simulating Seed Number in Grain Sorghum from Increases in Plant Dry Weight
Agron. J., September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1222 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Agronomy.