Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1977
Published in Agron J 69:899-902 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halloran, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Halloran, G. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Halloran, G. M.

Developmental Basis of Maturity Differences in Spring Wheat1

G. M. Halloran2

Characterization of the developmental basis of maturity of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell) was sought in studies of the range of vernalization and photoperiodic responses in a number of spring wheats.

Vernalization responses of 12 spring wheat cultivars of Australian and overseas origin were evaluated as final leaf number of plants after cold treatment of germinated seedlings at 4 C for weekly intervals from 0 to 6 weeks. With the exception of the wheats ‘Bordan’ and the fixed crossbred ‘KB’ each genotype exhibited a marked response to cold treatment as decreased final leaf number; each appeared to attain its threshold response to cold within the 6-week period of treatment. The behavior of two pairs of cultivars, ‘Insignia 49’ and ‘EarlySummer Insignia 49’, and ‘Thatcher’ and ‘Winter Thatcher’, each pair believed to be near-isogenic except for the presence and absence of vernalization response, indicated the likelihood that the possession of vernalization response, as such, was of no apparent significance in influencing final leaf number, spikelet number, and days to ear emergence under normal sowing times of spring wheat in southern Australia.

Variation in photoperiodic response within and between genotypes was examined under two daylengths — that of a normal field sowing and that of an extended photoperiod (18-hour). Photoperiodic response was shown to be likely of major significance in determining maturity of spring wheat grown in southern Australia. Reasonably high correlations were obtained between spikelet number and days to ear emergence under both the normal (r = +0.74**) and 18-hour photoperiod (r = +0.67**). Wide differences in spikelet number between wheats of closely similar developmental patterns indicated the likely presence of a significant genetic component of spikelet number determination in wheat.

It is postulated that in the absence of both photoperiod limitations and the need for vernalization, growth temperatures could differentially influence developmental rate among spring wheat genotypes.

Key Words: Vernalization response • Photoperiodic response • Isogenic lines • Final leaf number • Spikelet number • Development rate


1 Contribution from the Plant Sciences Section, School of Agriculture and Forestry, Parkville. Victoria, Australia 3052.

2 Senior lecturer in plant breeding and genetics.

Received for publication September 30, 1974.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
G. A. Van Esbroeck, M. A. Hussey, and M. A. Sanderson
Variation between Alamo and Cave-in-Rock Switchgrass in Response to Photoperiod Extension
Crop Sci., March 1, 2003; 43(2): 639 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Agronomy.