Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1977
Published in Agron J 69:432-436 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, O. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, O. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, O. R.

Movement of Three Herbicides in a Fine Sand Aquifer1

A. D. Schneider, A. F. Wiese and O. R. Jones2

In order to determine movement of farm chemicals that night accidentally contaminate underground water supplies, low concentrations of three herbicides and NaNO3 as a tracer were injected into a sand aquifer through a dual-purpose well. Herbicides used were picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid), atrazine (2chloro-4-(chylamino)-6-(isopropyl-amino)-s-triazine), and trifluralin ({alpha}, {alpha}, {alpha}-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine). Recharge by injection continued for 10 days at an average rate of 81.8 m3/hour. After a 10-day pause, the well was pumped for 12 days to determine if the herbicides and tracer could be recovered. Water samples were pumped from observation wells located 9, 20, and 45 m from the dual-purpose well. Herbicides were detected in the 9- and 20-m distant wells, but none of the herbicides or the tracer was detected in the 45-m distant well. Picloram and atrazine moved freely through the aquifer, but some trifluralin adbsorbed to aquifer particles around the well. Although two herbicides moved freely from the point of injection, all of the chemicals were removed from the aquifer by pumping the contaminated water. Ninety-three percent of the NO3 tracer and more than 91% of each herbicide were recovered with the pumped water. This study indicates that herbicides accidentally injected into a well in a relatively static aquifer can be recovered by pumping. Water could be utilized for irrigation of tolerant crops.

Key Words: Miscible displacement • Hydrodynamic dispersion


1 Contribution from the Soil, Water, and Air Sciences, Southern Region, ARS-USDA, in cooperation with the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A&M Univ.

2 Agricultural engineer, ARS-USDA, professor of weed science, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., and soil scientist, ARS-USDA Southwestern Great Plains Research Center, Bushland, TX 79012.

Received for publication July 10, 1976.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Agronomy.