Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1977
Published in Agron J 69:405-409 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, W. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, W. E.

Fitting Plants Nutritionally to Soils. II. Cotton1

J. C. Brown and W. E. Jones2

Fifteen cotton varieties (Gossypium hirsutum L.), representing germplasm recommended for different areas of the United States, were subjected to Fe, Zn, and Cu stresses and Al and Mn toxicities to determine their nutrient requirements. They were grown on the seven different soils described in part I of this study for soybeans. All cotton varieties grown on Quinlan soil (Fe stress) developed deficiency symptoms that were similar to symptoms produced in cotton grown on Shano and Taunton soils (Zn stress). On Quinlan and Taunton soils, the plants responded to both Fe and Zn. Iron added to Taunton soil decreased the uptake of Fe and increased the uptake of Zn by the plants. Lime added to Richland soil induced a Zn deficiency that increased Fe uptake by the plants. When Zn was added to this soil, yields increased and Fe uptake decreased in the plants. All 15 cotton varieties grew poorly on acid Bladen soil (Al toxic), and yields were doubled by liming and yield of C-7105, 73-319 doubled again by adding Cu. Best yields, with no toxicity symptoms, were obtained on Richland soil (Mn toxic). Cotton and soybean had different nutrient requirements. For example, cotton was Cu and Zn inefficient and Mn tolerant, whereas soybeans were Cu and Zn efficient and Mn intolerant in most varieties tested.

Key Words: Zn stress • Mn tolerance • Fe deficiency • Mn toxicity • Fe efficiency • Cu stress • Al toxicity • Nutrient requirements of plants


1 Contribution of the ARS/USDA, Northeastern Region, Agric. Res. Ctr., Beltsville, MD 20705.

2 Supervisory soil scientist and agricultural research technician, Plant Stress Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705.

Received for publication August 13, 1976.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Agronomy.