Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1977
Published in Agron J 69:347-350 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keser, M.
Right arrow Articles by Verrill, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Keser, M.
Right arrow Articles by Verrill, D. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Keser, M.
Right arrow Articles by Verrill, D. B.

Differential Aluminum Tolerance of Sugarbeet Cultivars, as Evidenced by Anatomical Structure1

M. Keser, Benedict F. Neubauer, F. E. Hutchinson and D. B. Verrill2

Early attempts to cultivate the sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris L.) in Maine were not successful due to large amounts of soluble Al in acid soils. The objectives of this study were to determine if a differential tolerance to Al exists among sugarbeet cultivars grown world-wide, and whether such tolerance could be detected in early stages of seedling growth by examination of morphological and anatomical structures.

All cultivars were grown in culture solutions of 0 and 4 ppm of Al at pH 4.8. Four parts per million was used because this concentration in culture solution was toxic to cultivar IS 922, a cultivar previously grown on a commercial basis in Maine. After 10 days growth, some cultivars exhibited more tolerance than others. This study concentrated on eight cultivars of the 116 originally tested. Cultivar IS 922 was used as the control; two cultivars were chosen for low tolerance, and five for their high tolerance to Al toxicity.

At 0 ppm of Al, all cultivars showed normal anatomical and morphological development. At 4 ppm of Al, the two most susceptible cultivars accumulated large amounts of aluminum phosphate. The meristematic zones of primary and lateral roots of these plants lost their normal pattern of organization and further growth appeared inhibited. Variability existed within each of the five cultivars chosen for their apparent tolerance, some plants accumulated aluminum phosphate and others did not.

This study indicated that differential tolerance to Al exists among sugarbeet cultivars, and among individual plants within the same cultivar. Tolerance can be determined at early developmental stages.

Key Words: Al toxicity • Red-staining precipitate • Differential tolerance • Beta vulgaris


1 Contribution by the Deps. of Botany and Plant Pathology and Plant and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04473. This research was supported in part by ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD, under Grant No. 12-14-100-9904 (34).

2 Research associate, associate professor of botany, professor of soil sciences, and graduate assistant of plant and soil sciences, respectively, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04473.

Received for publication April 29, 1976.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Agronomy.