Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 1977
Published in Agron J 69:205-208 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, R. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, R. G.

Use and Misuse of Multiple Comparison Procedures1

R. G. Petersen2

A number of statistical tests can assist in the interpretation of the results of agronomic experiments. Examination of recent issues of the Agronomy Journal indicates that one of the more popular procedures is to use some form of a multiple comparison test to look at pairwise comparisons among the treatment means. In this paper use of these tests is examined, and alternative procedures are suggested for situations in which multiple comparison tests are inappropriate. These are illustrated with examples extracted from the Agronomy Journal. In general, multiple comparison procedures are appropriate for "data snooping" following experiments with unstructured qualitative treatments. Multiple comparison tests are almost never appropriate for experiments in which 1) the treatments are graded levels of a quantitative variable, 2) for factorial combinations of two or more factors at two or more levels, and 3) for quantitative treatments where previously formulated linear combinations of treatment means are of particular interest.

Key Words: Data analysis • Interpretation of experimental results • Unstructured qualitative treatments • Quantitative treatments • Factorial experiments • Pairwise comparisons


1 Technical paper No. 4265 of the Oregon Agric. Exp. Stn., Corvallis, OR 97331.

2 Professor of statistics, Oregon State Univ.

Received for publication May 22, 1976.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. T. Edwards and L. C. Purcell
Soybean Yield and Biomass Responses to Increasing Plant Population Among Diverse Maturity Groups: I. Agronomic Characteristics
Crop Sci., August 1, 2005; 45(5): 1770 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Agronomy.