Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1975
Published in Agron J 67:699-704 (1975)
© 1975 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, N. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, N. J.

Accuracy of Lysimetric, Energy Balance, and Stability-corrected Aerodynamic Methods of Estimating Above-canopy Flux of CO21

S. B. Verma and N. J. Rosenberg2

Measurement of carbon dioxide exchange is necessary to indicate rates of photosynthesis in the field. Methods which are accurate over short periods of 15 min to 1 hour can indicate the influence of changing weather conditions on crop photosynthetic activity. Three micrometeorological methods—the lysimetric, energy balance, and stability-corrected aerodynamic—can be used for field determination of the flux of CO2 to a crop surface. The objective of this paper is to present a detailed comparison of the performances of the three methods. Measurements were made in an oat field at Mead, Neb. Results obtained with the three methods were in good agreement, both on a short-period and on a daily basis. The calculated CO2 flux agreed reasonably well with estimates from other oat-photosynthesis studies. Midday CO2 flux rates ranged from about 2 to 3 x 10–7 g cm–2 sec–1. The three micrometerological methods were subjected to detailed error analysis to evaluate the relative influence of errors in measurement of the constituent input parameters used to calculate the flux of carbon dioxide, namely water vapor flux and gradients of vapor pressure and CO2 concentration in the lysimetric method; net radiation, soil heat flux and gradients of vapor pressure, air temperature and CO2 concentration in the energy balance method; and gradients of windspeed, air temperature and CO2 concentration in the stability-corrected aerodynamic method.

Key Words: Micrometerology • Microclimate • Energy balance • Lysimeters • Aerodynamic • CO2 Flux • Error analysis • Field-photosynthesis • Stability correction • Exchange coefficients • Turbulent transfer


1 Published as paper No. 3807, Journal Series, the Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn. Work reported was conducted under Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn. Project 20-31 and Regional Research Project 11–33.

2 Assistant Professor and Professor of Agricultural Meteorology, Dep. of Agric. Eng., Institute of Agric. and Natural Resources, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68503.

Received for publication May 23, 1974.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Agronomy.