Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1973
Published in Agron J 65:781-783 (1973)
© 1973 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moschler, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Shear, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moschler, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Shear, G. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Moschler, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Shear, G. M.

Comparative Lime Effects on Continous No-Tillage and Conventionally Tilled Corn1

W. W. Moschler, D. C. Martens, C. I. Rich and G. M. Shear2

Because the absence of tillage precludes the mixing of lime with soil when no-tillage corn (Zea mays L.) is grown, an experiment was conducted to determine if surface application would be effective. Information on the subject is not presently available but is needed to guide growers in neutralizing soil acidity caused by high rates of nitrogen applied to corn.Because the absence of tillage precludes the mixing of lime with soil when no-tillage corn (Zea mays L.) is grown, an experiment was conducted to determine if surface application would be effective. Information on the subject is not presently available but is needed to guide growers in neutralizing soil acidity caused by high rates of nitrogen applied to corn.

Field studies over an 8-year period compared continuous no-tillage corn with surface-applied lime to continuous conventionally tilled corn with lime incorporated into the soil. Comparisons of the two tillage methods were also made without lime to determine the degree of response to lime. Lime increased corn yield more than twice as much in no-tillage culture as in conventional tillage. Lime was essential for highest yields with both tillage methods but the yield increase due to surface applied lime in no-tillage culture averaged 31.3%, compared to a 13.5% yield increase due to incorporated, lime in conventional tillage culture.

Associated with the larger yield increase from lime in the no-tillage culture were 1) a higher pH in the 0 to 10-cm soil layer (averaging 6.4 in no-tillage compared to 6.0 in conventional tillage) in the eighth year; and 2) larger increase in exchangeable Ca and a reduction in exchangeable AI in the 0 to 10-cm layer. The pH and exchangeable Ca and AI in the 10 to 20-cm soil layers from tilled and nontilled soil were almost identical. A highly significant correlation was found between maturity of the corn and yield increase due to lime. Thus, it appears probable that the principal mechanism for the yield reduction caused by the lack of lime was reduced growth. This was especially apparent in early growth stages but was partially overcome later. It was more noticeable in no-tillage corn than in conventionally tilled corn. At harvest, the increase in dry matter content of no-tillage corn ears which was caused by lime was larger than that in conventionally tilled corn.

Water use efficiency for the increased corn grain yield due to lime in no-tillage was calculated to be almost three times that in conventional tillage.

Key Words: Lime • No-tillage • Soil reaction • Soil layers • Corn yields • Soluble Al • Exchangeable cations


1 Contribution from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Division of Research, Departments of Agronomy and Plant Pathology and Physiology, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061.

2 Assistant, Associate, and Professor of Agronomy, and Professor Emeritus of Plant Physiology, respectively.

Received for publication January 15, 1973.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
T. T. Brown, R. T. Koenig, D. R. Huggins, J. B. Harsh, and R. E. Rossi
Lime Effects on Soil Acidity, Crop Yield, and Aluminum Chemistry in Direct-Seeded Cropping Systems
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2008; 72(3): 634 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
C. B. Godsey, G. M. Pierzynski, D. B. Mengel, and R. E. Lamond
Management of Soil Acidity in No-Till Production Systems through Surface Application of Lime
Agron. J., May 11, 2007; 99(3): 764 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
E. F. Caires, L. R. F. Alleoni, M. A. Cambri, and G. Barth
Surface Application of Lime for Crop Grain Production Under a No-Till System
Agron. J., April 27, 2005; 97(3): 791 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. R. Gebhardt, M. R. Gebhardt, T. C. Daniel, E. E. Schweizer, and R. R. Allmaras
Conservation Tillage
Science, November 8, 1985; 230(4726): 625 - 630.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Agronomy.