Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1973
Published in Agron J 65:603-605 (1973)
© 1973 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rhue, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kamprath, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rhue, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kamprath, E. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rhue, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kamprath, E. J.

Leaching Losses of Sulfur During Winter Months When Applied as Gypsum, Elemental S or Prilled S1

R. D. Rhue and E. J. Kamprath2

Sandy soils of the southeastern United States are often deficient in sulfur. The use of sulfate-containing fertilizers does not result in any buildup of sulfur in sandy soils since the sulfate is readily leached during whiter months. Interest, therefore, has developed in the use of elemental sulfur as a means of maintaining an adequate supply of sulfur where leaching is a problem. Studies were conducted with gypsum, finely divided elemental sulfur, and prilled sulfur on a Wagram loamy sand and a Georgeville silty clay loam to determine the levels of sulfate sulfur resulting from additions of these sources. Sulfate contents of the O to 15-, 15 to 30- and 30 to 45-cm depths were determined at various times over a period of 200 days after the different sulfur sources were applied in October.

Almost all of the sulfate, that added as gypsum and that resulting from the oxidation of elemental sulfur, had been leached from the top 45 cm of the Wagram soil 180 days after application. There was essentially no movement of sulfate, however, in the Georgeville soil.

Oxidization of finely divided elemental sulfur appeared to be completed in both soils 200 days after application. There was a buildup of sulfate in the Georgeville surface soil from oxidation of the elemental sulfur. In the Wagram soil, however, leaching was rapid enough to prevent buildup of sulfate in the surface soil. Very little oxidation of prilled sulfur appeared to be occurring to any extent in either soil.

Key Words: Sulfur oxidation • Sulfate


1 Contribution from the Dept. of Soil Science, North Carolina State University Agriculture Experiment Station, Raleigh, N.C. Published with approval of the Director as Paper No. 3866 of the Journal series. This work was supported by a grant from The Sulphur Institute.

2 Former graduate assistant and Professor of Soil Science.

Received for publication September 27, 1972.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Agronomy.