Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1973
Published in Agron J 65:570-574 (1973)
© 1973 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharpe, P. J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sharpe, P. J. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sharpe, P. J. H.

Adaxial and Abaxial Stomatal Resistance of Cotton in the Field1

Peter J. H. Sharpe2

An experiment was conducted near. Sydney, Australia to determine the adaxial and abaxial stomatal responses of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to environmental factors under noncycling field conditions. Cotton plants were grown in small lysimeter pans and transpiration was measured by strain guage lysimeters. Leaf temperature, ambient temperature and other micrometeorological parameters were monitored continuously, Stomatal resistances were regularly measured for both surfaces with a diffusion resistance porometer developed by the author.

It was found that under field conditions, the adaxial and abaxial stomata differ in their response to light, water stress, and ambient temperature. Under most conditions, including darkness and. drought, the adaxial surface was considerably higher in resistance than the abaxial surface. However, the differences in resistance between the two surfaces disappeared under a combination of high light and temperature conditions. High transpiration rates and low leaf resistance were associated with high ambient temperatures. With sufficient soil moisture there was no evidence of midday stomatal closure even under sew;re light and temperature regimes.

It was found that sampling the resistance of one surface alone (particularly the adaxial) did not give an accurate estimate of the overall leaf resistance. In addition, it was also found that similar .resistances on both surfaces under any one set of environmental conditions does not necessarily imply that this will be so under all conditions.

Key Words: Diffusion resistance porometer • Water stress • Light • Temperature


1 Contribution from School of Botany, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

2 Former Graduate Student, University of New South Wales (now Assistant Professor, Department of Bioengineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Agronomy.