Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1972
Published in Agron J 64:521-524 (1972)
© 1972 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giordano, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mortvedt, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Giordano, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mortvedt, J. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Giordano, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mortvedt, J. J.

Rice Response to Zn in Flooded and Nonflooded Soil1

P. M. Giordano and J. J. Mortvedt2

Zinc deficiency in rice (Oryza sativa L.) has only recently been diagnosed. Although most Zn studies have been conducted on flooded rice, comparative data concerning the availability of Zn under upland and flooded soil conditions is needed. Therefore, rice (var. ‘Bluebelle’) was grown hi greenhouse pots on flooded and moist, limed Crowley sil (pH 7.5). Phosphorus, as concentrated superphosphate, was applied at rates of 20 and 200 ppm and Zn as ZnSO4, was applied at rates of 1, 4, and 16 ppm. Dry matter production and P uptake of immature plants were doubled and uptake of Zn was up to five times as great when the plants were grown on flooded rather than moist soil. The Zn concentration in the tissue decreased at the high P rate on moist but not on flooded soil. The percentage recovery of fertilizer Zn by the crop was greater from flooded than moist soil, especially at the high P rate.

Mixed and surface applications of Zn were comparable for flooded rice, whereas middepth placement (8 cm below soil surface) was less effective. Both surface and middepth placements were less effective than mixing under nonflooded soil conditions. Results of laboratory studies indicated that the mobility of Zn applied as ZnSO4 was comparable in flooded and moist soil. The amount of DTPA-extractable Zn tended to be higher in moist than in flooded soil. This suggests that DTPA may not provide a reliable measure of Zn availability in flooded soils and that differences in Zn uptake may be related to root distribution or some other physiological or morphological characteristic of rice roots growing in moist or flooded soil.

Key Words: Zn mobility • Zn extraction • P fertilization • 65Zn • Zn efficiency • Zn placement


1 Contribution from the Soils and Fertilizer Research Branch, Division of Agricultural Development, National Fertilizer Development Center, Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Ala. This research was supported in part under an AID Participating Agency Service Agreement No. R.A. (AQ) 5-69.

2 Research Soil Chemists.

Received for publication December 23, 1971.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Agronomy.