Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1970
Published in Agron J 62:618-620 (1970)
© 1970 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scarsbrook, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scarsbrook, C. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Scarsbrook, C. E.

Regression of Nitrogen Uptake on Nitrogen Added from Four Sources Applied to Grass1

C. E. Scarsbrook2

Research was conducted to evaluate efficiencies of N fertilizers by comparing slopes of N uptake on N applied regression equations. Ammonium nitrate (33.5-0-0), diammonium phosphate (21-23-0), urea (45-0-0), and ureaammonium phosphate (33-9-0) were surface applied at four rates of N to Coastal bermudagrass on Norfolk sandy loam and to Pensacola bahiagrass on Boswell fine sandy loam. Relative efficiencies for N recovery were determined by comparison of the slopes (b) of the equations. The highest average efficiency (b = 0.80) was obtained with ammonium nitrate on bermudagrass. Values of b were similar for all sources of N on bahiagrass. There was a straight line relationship when dry forage produced (y) was plotted against N uptake (x). The equations were y = 1,500 -f 48x and y = 3,000 -j- 34x for bahiagrass and bermudagrass, respectively. These differences in slopes of the equations reflect the differences both in N contents and yields of the forage.

Key Words: Efficiency of nitrogen recovery


1 Research was conducted to evaluate efficiencies of N fertilizers by comparing slopes of N uptake on N applied regression equations. Ammonium nitrate (33.5-0-0), diammonium phosphate (21-23-0), urea (45-0-0), and ureaammonium phosphate (33-9-0) were surface applied at four rates of N to Coastal bermudagrass on Norfolk sandy loam and to Pensacola bahiagrass on Boswell fine sandy loam. Relative efficiencies for N recovery were determined by comparison of the slopes (b) of the equations. The highest average efficiency (b = 0.80) was obtained with ammonium nitrate on bermudagrass. Values of b were similar for all sources of N on bahiagrass. There was a straight line relationship when dry forage produced (y) was plotted against N uptake (x). The equations were y = 1,500 -f 48x and y = 3,000 -j- 34x for bahiagrass and bermudagrass, respectively. These differences in slopes of the equations reflect the differences both in N contents and yields of the forage.

2 Contribution from Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station. Research supported in part by Tennessee Valley Authority Contract, TV 13436A.

Received for publication February 13, 1970.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1970 by the American Society of Agronomy.