Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1968
Published in Agron J 60:703-705 (1968)
© 1968 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marten, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Donker, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marten, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Donker, J. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marten, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Donker, J. D.

Determinants of Pasture Value of Phalaris arundinacea L. vs. Bromus inermis Leyss.1

G. C. Marten and J. D. Donker2

The objectives of this study were to determine the influence of the apparent lack of palatability of reed canarygrass on performance of grazing dairy animals and to compare quality and yielding ability of smooth bromegrass vs. reed canarygrass through measurement of gains per animal and gains per hectare when the two grasses were grazed alone under two grazing pressures.

In a preliminary pasture palatability trial, dairy heifers showed a distinct preference for brome over reed canary. A 4–year pasture production study revealed, however, that average daily gains of heifers restricted to rotational grazing within only brome or reed canary did not differ (0.74 kg for each). Also reed canary produced 20% more heifer gain per hectare than brome due to greater carrying capacity.

The heavier grazing pressure caused a slight but significant reduction in average daily gains per heifer, but it resulted in increases in heifer gain per hectare over the lighter grazing pressure (19% for reed canary and 16% for brome).

The preference of heifers for brome over reed canary was of little or no practical significance when the two grasses were grazed individually without choice. Reed canary was obviously higher yielding and more persistent than brome, and these traits merit recommendation of reed canary for pasture situations in which a pure stand of grass on upland mineral soil is desired.

Key Words: smooth bromegrass • reed canarygrass • dairy heifers • palatability • forage yield • grazing pressure • N fertilization of grass


1 Paper no. 6507, Scientific Journal Series, Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA.

2 Research Agronomist, Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, and Professor of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55101.

Received for publication May 1, 1968.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1968 by the American Society of Agronomy.