Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1968
Published in Agron J 60:469-472 (1968)
© 1968 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Unger, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Unger, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. J., Jr.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Unger, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. J.

Residue Placement Effects on Decomposition, Evaporation, and Soil Moisture Distribution1

Paul W. Unger and J. J. Parker, Jr.2

In a greenhouse study, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)residue placement affected residue decomposition, evaporation, soil moisture distribution, pH, and nitrate-N content. Residues mixed with or covered by soil decomposed at similar rates, but surface residues did not decompose measurably. Surface and covered residue treatments, compared with the mixed residue treatments, reduced evaporation 57.4 and 18.9%, respectively. When approximately 60% of plant available moisture remained in the soil, moisture contents decreased with soil depth below the residue layer for surface and covered residue treatment. For the mixed residue treatment, soil moisture content initially increased with depth, then decreased. Soil pH remained relatively high for mixed and covered residue treatments, but decreased for the surface residue treatment.

No differences in decomposition, evaporation, or soil moisture distribution were noted due to rate of N or sulfur application. Soil pH was lowered by the high N application rate and was significantly correlated with soil nitrate-N content. Applied sulfur did not affect pH.

Key Words: residue management • ammonium nitrate • sulfur • residue decomposition • soil pH • soil nitrate-nitrogen • nitrogen immobilization


1 Contribution from the Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, in cooperation with the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University.

2 Research Soil Scientist and Physical Science Technician, USDA Southwestern Great Plains Research Center, Bushland, Texas 79012

Received for publication October 18, 1967.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1968 by the American Society of Agronomy.