Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 11 January 2008
Published in Agron J 100:128-135 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agrojnl2007.0015
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clapham, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rayburn, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clapham, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rayburn, E. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Clapham, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rayburn, E. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Grazing Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops

TRITICALE

Forage Pasture Production, Risk Analysis, and the Buffering Capacity of Triticale

William M. Claphama,*, James M. Feddersa, A. Ozzie Abayeb and Edward B. Rayburnc

a USDA-ARS, Appalachian Farming Systems Research Center, 1224 Airport Rd., Beaver, WV 25813
b Dep. of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., 245 Smyth Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061
c West Virginia Univ., 1078 Agricultural Science Building, P.O. Box 6108, Morgantown, WV 26506-6108

* Corresponding author (William.Clapham{at}ars.usda.gov).

Many livestock producers minimize input costs by relying solely on naturalized, mixed-species pasture, but expose themselves to risks associated with forage yields that fluctuate in response to variable environmental conditions. This study was undertaken to assess winter triticale (xTriticosecale spp.) as a potential component of forage systems from the perspective of reducing forage yield risk. Triticale was sown each month from May until October in replicated plots for five consecutive years. Monthly harvests of triticale and mixed-pasture plots were made through October during the year of establishment and in April and May the following spring. Monte Carlo simulation modeled differences between triticale and mixed pasture yields for each planting month and harvest month combination. The models predicted that triticale yields in August (June planted) and October (August planted) should exceed mixed pasture yields by averages of 0.62 ± 0.32 (mean ± standard deviation) and 0.77 ± 0.52 Mg ha–1, respectively. Yields of triticale planted in July or later and harvested in the following spring were also predicted to exceed mixed pasture by 0.50 ± 0.21 Mg ha–1 for July planted/April harvest to 1.33 ± 0.32 Mg ha–1 for September planted/April harvest. Risk analysis produced probabilities of benefit from incorporating triticale into forage systems, thus generating more meaningful results than conventional ANOVA.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.